Mon Col Anvers brand cover
53 /100
On the Right Path
Image Credit © Mon Col Anvers

Mon Col Anvers Sustainability Audit & Brand Review

Mon Col Anvers is a Belgian fashion label founded in 2016 by Eva Juchtmans. The brand focuses on a slow fashion model, producing two annual collections characterized by a blend of French elegance and Scandinavian minimalism. Using natural materials like GOTS-certified organic cotton and Lyocell, the brand emphasizes garment longevity and versatile design for the conscious modern woman.

Read Full Analysis
53 /100
On the Right Path

Loopli's Insights

Mon Col Anvers stands out for its architectural commitment to material integrity. By strictly avoiding synthetic blends and prioritizing mono-materials like GOTS-certified organic cotton and TENCEL™ Lyocell, the brand ensures its garments are not only lower-impact during production but also theoretically easier to recycle at their end-of-life. This dedication to natural fibers effectively eliminates the risk of microplastic shedding, a critical win for marine ecosystems. Furthermore, their active participation in the circular economy through the Belgian rental platform Dressr and the Swiss directory Loopli shows a genuine desire to maximize garment utility beyond the traditional retail model.

However, transparency remains a significant hurdle. While the brand utilizes European production in Poland and Portugal to reduce its logistical footprint, the use of a Belgian intermediary for manufacturing in Portugal obscures direct visibility into factory conditions. The lack of published quantitative data regarding carbon emissions (Scopes 1-3) and the absence of verifiable living wage evidence suggest that while the brand's heart is in the right place, its empirical reporting has not yet caught up to its aesthetic promises. Mon Col Anvers is a superior alternative to fast fashion, but true sustainability leadership will require stripping away the marketing veneer for hard, public data.

Certifications & Initiatives

FSC

Forest Stewardship Council

GOTS
GOTS

Global Organic Textile Standard

Products from Mon Col Anvers

Mon Col Anvers: Timeless Slow Fashion Style

Mon Col Anvers represents the archetype of the independent boutique brand attempting to navigate the complexities of ethical production through a "less is more" philosophy. Founded in 2016 by Eva Juchtmans, the brand emerged from a desire to provide women with high-quality, long-lasting garments that bypass the ephemeral trends of the high street. By operating on a slow fashion model, strictly limiting production to two collections per year, the brand effectively decouples itself from the overproduction cycles that define modern environmental degradation in the textile sector. This deliberate pace is not just an aesthetic choice; it is a fundamental pillar of their sustainability strategy, reducing stock waste and the pressure for constant consumption.

Architectural Minimalism and the Shift Toward Responsibility

The evolution of Mon Col Anvers has seen a progressive tightening of its material standards. Initially focused on design-led pieces, the brand has increasingly integrated certified raw materials into its core lineup. Their commitment to GOTS-certified organic cotton and TENCEL™ Lyocell signifies a move away from the pesticide-heavy conventional cotton industry and the energy-intensive production of virgin synthetics. This shift demonstrates an awareness of the "invisible" impacts of fashion, specifically the chemical runoff and water scarcity associated with traditional fiber cultivation. By choosing European production hubs, the brand also seeks to maintain a shorter supply chain, which in theory reduces the carbon footprint associated with global logistics and ensures closer oversight of manufacturing standards.

Traceability and the European Manufacturing Paradox

Today, Mon Col Anvers focuses its production in Poland and Portugal, countries chosen for their proximity to the brand's Belgian headquarters and their adherence to European labor laws. While this regional focus is a positive indicator, the brand’s traceability remains opaque at the granular level. For its Portuguese manufacturing, Mon Col Anvers utilizes a Belgian intermediary, a common practice that nonetheless creates a buffer between the brand and the factory floor. This lack of direct relationship can obscure visibility into specific Tier 1 conditions. While the brand emphasizes "honest production," it has yet to publish a full list of its Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers, a step that is increasingly becoming the industry benchmark for true transparency.

Sustainability and the Absence of Empirical Data

When we look at the brand's sustainability impact, the narrative is a mix of commendable intentions and missing data. Mon Col Anvers excels in its choice of low-impact fibers, which naturally require fewer resources than their conventional counterparts. However, the brand does not currently publish a sustainability report that includes quantitative measurements of its carbon emissions (Scopes 1, 2, or 3) or its total water consumption. Without these hard numbers, it is difficult to assess the brand's actual progress toward environmental targets. They have yet to set Science-Based Targets (SBTi), leaving their climate strategy in the realm of qualitative promise rather than empirical commitment. Their reliance on deadstock fabrics is also a double-edged sword: while it prevents waste, it complicates traceability as the origin of these "leftover" materials is often unknown.

Circularity Through Rental and Material Integrity

Circularity is where Mon Col Anvers shows its most innovative leanings. Their partnership with Dressr, a Belgian fashion-as-a-service platform, is a significant achievement. By facilitating garment rental, they extend the life cycle of each piece and reduce the need for new production. Furthermore, their design philosophy prioritizes mono-materials, garments made from a single type of fiber. This is a critical technical advantage; blended fabrics (like cotton-poly mixes) are notoriously difficult to recycle, whereas pure organic cotton or Lyocell can be more easily processed at the end of their life. This "design for disassembly" mindset shows a forward-thinking approach to the product's eventual retirement, though the brand currently lacks a formal in-house take-back or repair program.

Environmental Stewardship and the Microplastic Mitigation

The brand's impact on the planet is bolstered by its avoidance of virgin synthetics. By focusing on natural and cellulosic fibers, Mon Col Anvers avoids contributing to the global crisis of microplastic pollution that stems from washing polyester and nylon. Their packaging choices also reflect this awareness; they have transitioned to recycled paper and water-soluble PVA bags. While these bags are better than conventional plastic, they still require specific disposal conditions to avoid micro-residual buildup. Despite these efforts, the brand’s overall planet impact remains difficult to fully audit without public disclosure of its energy mix and chemical management protocols beyond standard REACH compliance.

The Human Element and the Living Wage Gap

Regarding people impact, the brand relies heavily on the "Made in Europe" label as a proxy for ethical treatment. While manufacturing in Poland and Portugal provides a safer legal framework than many high-risk countries, it does not guarantee a living wage. In both countries, the statutory minimum wage frequently falls significantly short of what is required for a decent standard of living. Currently, there is no public evidence that Mon Col Anvers ensures the payment of a living wage throughout its supply chain, nor does it appear to have a formal third-party social audit program (like Fair Wear or SA8000) to verify worker grievances and fair compensation. Transparency here is the missing link between a "good" brand and a truly ethical one.

Animal Welfare and Vegan Considerations

Mon Col Anvers does not use leather, fur, or exotic skins, which is a positive for animal welfare. However, the brand is not a certified vegan label. Reports indicate the use of silk in some collections, an animal-derived fiber that raises ethical concerns regarding the treatment of silkworms. Because the brand lacks specific animal welfare certifications (such as the Responsible Wool Standard for any knitwear), it remains in a grey area for consumers who prioritize strict cruelty-free credentials. To improve, the brand should formalize a non-animal-derived material policy and seek third-party verification for its plant-based claims.

Strategic Roadmaps for Improvement

To elevate its standing from a boutique label to a sustainability leader, Mon Col Anvers must bridge the data gap. First, moving beyond a Belgian intermediary to establish direct, audited relationships with Portuguese factories is essential. Second, the brand should initiate a baseline carbon footprint assessment to set measurable reduction targets. Transparency could be vastly improved by publishing a digital factory map and disclosing the specific percentage of recycled versus virgin content in every collection. Finally, establishing a formal repair service or a "pre-loved" resale section on their own website would close the circularity loop that they have already begun to build through rental partnerships.

Conclusion: A Visionary Label in Need of Evidence

Mon Col Anvers is undeniably a breath of fresh air in an industry suffocated by disposable trends. Their commitment to slow fashion, high-quality natural fibers, and circularity through rental shows a genuine dedication to changing the way we consume clothing. Their strength lies in their aesthetic integrity and their refusal to engage in the volume-driven madness of fast fashion. However, for the brand to truly claim the mantle of sustainability, it must move past the "Made in Europe" narrative and provide the hard, public evidence that its workers are thriving and its environmental footprint is shrinking. They are a brand with a strong soul and a beautiful product; now they must provide the data to match.

Our Ratings

Planet
11/20
Materials
24/25
People
00/20
Circularity
14/25
Animals
04/10

Planet

Focuses on European production and natural fibers, but lacks quantitative carbon (Scope 1-3) and water reduction data.

  • Carbon Scope 1 & 2: n/a
  • Carbon Scope 3: n/a
  • Climate Targets: n/a
  • SBTi Targets: n/a
  • Renewable Energy: n/a
  • Water Management: n/a
  • Low Volume Model: Yes
  • Regional Production (Low Risk): Yes

Materials

Strong use of GOTS organic cotton and TENCEL™, but reliance on deadstock fabrics introduces traceability risks.

  • Majority Sustainable Fibers: Yes
  • Certified Materials: Yes
  • Virgin Synthetics Minimized: Yes
  • Circular Inputs: Yes
  • Chemical Management: Yes
  • PFAS Free: n/a
  • Plastic Free Packaging: Yes

People

Manufacturing in Poland and Portugal offers basic legal protections, but there is no evidence of living wages being paid.

  • Tier 1 Transparency: n/a
  • Tier 2 Transparency: n/a
  • Third-Party Social Audit: n/a
  • Living Wage Action: n/a
  • Grievance Mechanism: n/a
  • Governance Certification: n/a

Circularity

Excellent rental partnership via Dressr and mono-material design, though lacks in-house repair and take-back schemes.

  • Design for Recyclability: Yes
  • Durability / Guarantee: n/a
  • Repair Service: n/a
  • Resale / Takeback: n/a
  • Rental: Yes
  • End of Life Guidance: n/a

Animals

Avoids leather and fur, but likely uses silk, preventing a full vegan status and lacking welfare certifications.

  • Major Animal Materials Avoided: Yes
  • No Fur / Exotic Skins: n/a
  • Certified Animal Materials: n/a
  • Vegan / Cruelty Free: No

Frequently Asked Questions

Mon Col Anvers is a 'Good' alternative to fast fashion, focusing on high-quality natural fibers like GOTS cotton and Lyocell. However, it lacks hard data on carbon emissions and cannot yet prove that living wages are paid throughout its supply chain.

The garments are designed in Belgium and produced in Poland and Portugal. While European production is lower risk, the brand uses an intermediary for Portuguese manufacturing, which limits direct transparency into factory floors.

No. The brand operates on a slow fashion model, releasing only two collections per year. This limited volume reduces the waste and overproduction inherent in the fast-fashion industry.

The brand has eliminated virgin plastic packaging, using recycled paper and water-soluble bags made from PVA. While an improvement, these bags require specific conditions to biodegrade fully.

While the brand uses mostly plant-based materials and avoids leather and fur, it is not certified vegan and has been reported to use silk, which is an animal-derived fiber.

The brand partners with the rental platform Dressr to keep garments in use longer and is listed on the circular directory Loopli.ch. Its use of mono-materials also makes garments easier to recycle.

There is no public evidence confirming the payment of living wages. The brand cites 'European Social Law,' but statutory minimum wages in Poland and Portugal often fall below the living wage threshold.

Yes, the brand uses GOTS-certified organic cotton and FSC-certified cellulosic fibers like TENCEL™ Lyocell and EcoVero™ viscose.

More information about Mon Col Anvers

Logo
Mon Col Anvers Logo - Sustainable Fashion Brand on Loopli
Founded Year 2016
Headquarters Country Belgium
Price Range Moderate ($$)
Delivery fees EUR 15.00
Return policy 14 Days
Website https://www.moncol.be/
Instagram @moncolanvers
Facebook @moncolanvers
LinkedIn @mon-col-anvers
Pinterest @moncolanvers

Help us keep this information accurate

We do our best to keep all brand information up to date and reliable. If you notice anything that should be corrected, updated, or clarified, please let us know.

Contact Us Contact

This assessment and score are produced by humans at Loopli, based on publicly available information, brand disclosures, certifications, and our internal sustainability evaluation framework.

We strive to be as accurate, fair, and up to date as possible. However, sustainability data can evolve over time and some aspects may be subject to interpretation or limited by data availability. As a result, this assessment should be understood as an informed analysis, not an absolute or definitive judgment.

If you are a brand representative or reader and believe that any information is incorrect, outdated, or missing, please contact us. We welcome corrections, additional documentation, and clarifications, especially when supported by verifiable sources.